CAPEC-298: UDP Ping
Description
Extended Description
Many modern operating systems will not respond to ICMP type 17 messages for security reasons. Determining whether a system or router will respond to an ICMP Address Mask Request helps the adversary determine operating system or firmware version. Additionally, because these types of messages are rare, they are easily spotted by intrusion detection systems. Many ICMP scanning tools support IP spoofing to help conceal the origin of the actual request among a storm of similar ICMP messages. It is a common practice for border firewalls and gateways to be configured to block ingress ICMP type 17 and egress ICMP type 18 messages.
Severity :
Low
Possibility :
Type :
Detailed
Relationships with other CAPECs
This table shows the other attack patterns and high level categories that are related to this attack pattern.
Prerequisites
This table shows the other attack patterns and high level categories that are related to this attack pattern.
- The adversary requires the ability to send a UDP datagram to a remote host and receive a response.
- The adversary requires the ability to craft custom UDP Packets for use during network reconnaissance.
- The target's firewall must not be configured to block egress ICMP messages.
Skills required
This table shows the other attack patterns and high level categories that are related to this attack pattern.
Taxonomy mappings
Mappings to ATT&CK, OWASP and other frameworks.
Resources required
UDP pings can be performed via the use of a port scanner or by raw socket manipulation using a scripting or programming language. Packet injection tools are also useful for this purpose. Depending upon the technique used it may also be necessary to sniff the network in order to see the response.
Related CWE
A Related Weakness relationship associates a weakness with this attack pattern. Each association implies a weakness that must exist for a given attack to be successful.
Visit http://capec.mitre.org/ for more details.