CAPEC-459: Creating a Rogue Certification Authority Certificate
Description
Extended Description
Alternatively, the second certificate could be a signing certificate. Thus the adversary is able to start their own Certification Authority that is anchored in its root of trust in the legitimate Certification Authority that has signed the attacker's first X.509 certificate. If the original Certificate Authority was accepted by default by browsers, so will the Certificate Authority set up by the adversary and any certificates that it signs. As a result, the adversary is able to generate any SSL certificates to impersonate any web server, and the user's browser will not issue any warning to the victim. This can be used to compromise HTTPS communications and other types of systems where PKI and X.509 certificates may be used (e.g., VPN, IPSec).
Severity :
Very High
Possibility :
Medium
Type :
Detailed
Relationships with other CAPECs
This table shows the other attack patterns and high level categories that are related to this attack pattern.
Prerequisites
This table shows the other attack patterns and high level categories that are related to this attack pattern.
- Certification Authority is using a hash function with insufficient collision resistance to generate the certificate hash to be signed
Skills required
This table shows the other attack patterns and high level categories that are related to this attack pattern.
- High Understanding of how to force a hash collision in X.509 certificates
- High An attacker must be able to craft two X.509 certificates that produce the same hash value
- Medium Knowledge needed to set up a certification authority
Taxonomy mappings
Mappings to ATT&CK, OWASP and other frameworks.
Resources required
Knowledge of a certificate authority that uses hashing algorithms with poor collision resistance
A valid certificate request and a malicious certificate request with identical hash values
Related CWE
A Related Weakness relationship associates a weakness with this attack pattern. Each association implies a weakness that must exist for a given attack to be successful.
Visit http://capec.mitre.org/ for more details.