CWE-682: Incorrect Calculation

Description

The product performs a calculation that generates incorrect or unintended results that are later used in security-critical decisions or resource management.

Submission Date :

April 11, 2008, midnight

Modification Date :

2023-06-29 00:00:00+00:00

Organization :

MITRE
Extended Description

When product performs a security-critical calculation incorrectly, it might lead to incorrect resource allocations, incorrect privilege assignments, or failed comparisons among other things. Many of the direct results of an incorrect calculation can lead to even larger problems such as failed protection mechanisms or even arbitrary code execution.

Example Vulnerable Codes

Example - 1

The following image processing code allocates a table for images.


img_t table_ptr; /*struct containing img data, 10kB each*/int num_imgs;...num_imgs = get_num_imgs();table_ptr = (img_t*)malloc(sizeof(img_t)*num_imgs);...

This code intends to allocate a table of size num_imgs, however as num_imgs grows large, the calculation determining the size of the list will eventually overflow (CWE-190). This will result in a very small list to be allocated instead. If the subsequent code operates on the list as if it were num_imgs long, it may result in many types of out-of-bounds problems (CWE-119).

Example - 2

This code attempts to calculate a football team's average number of yards gained per touchdown.


...int touchdowns = team.getTouchdowns();int yardsGained = team.getTotalYardage();System.out.println(team.getName() + " averages " + yardsGained / touchdowns + "yards gained for every touchdown scored");...

The code does not consider the event that the team they are querying has not scored a touchdown, but has gained yardage. In that case, we should expect an ArithmeticException to be thrown by the JVM. This could lead to a loss of availability if our error handling code is not set up correctly.

Example - 3

This example attempts to calculate the position of the second byte of a pointer.


int *p = x;char * second_char = (char *)(p + 1);

In this example, second_char is intended to point to the second byte of p. But, adding 1 to p actually adds sizeof(int) to p, giving a result that is incorrect (3 bytes off on 32-bit platforms). If the resulting memory address is read, this could potentially be an information leak. If it is a write, it could be a security-critical write to unauthorized memory-- whether or not it is a buffer overflow. Note that the above code may also be wrong in other ways, particularly in a little endian environment.

Visit http://cwe.mitre.org/ for more details.

© cvefeed.io
Latest DB Update: Nov. 21, 2024 16:14