CVE-2004-1038
Apple FireWire/IEEE 1394 Design Error Memory Access
Description
A design error in the IEEE1394 specification allows attackers with physical access to a device to read and write to sensitive memory using a modified FireWire/IEEE 1394 client, thus bypassing intended restrictions that would normally require greater degrees of physical access to exploit. NOTE: this was reported in 2008 to affect Windows Vista, but some Linux-based operating systems have protection mechanisms against this attack.
INFO
Published Date :
March 1, 2005, 5 a.m.
Last Modified :
Oct. 19, 2018, 3:30 p.m.
Source :
[email protected]
Remotely Exploitable :
No
Impact Score :
10.0
Exploitability Score :
3.9
References to Advisories, Solutions, and Tools
Here, you will find a curated list of external links that provide in-depth
information, practical solutions, and valuable tools related to
CVE-2004-1038.
We scan GitHub repositories to detect new proof-of-concept exploits. Following list is a collection of public exploits and proof-of-concepts, which have been published on GitHub (sorted by the most recently updated).
Results are limited to the first 15 repositories due to potential performance issues.
The following list is the news that have been mention
CVE-2004-1038 vulnerability anywhere in the article.
The following table lists the changes that have been made to the
CVE-2004-1038 vulnerability over time.
Vulnerability history details can be useful for understanding the evolution of a vulnerability, and for identifying the most recent changes that may impact the vulnerability's severity, exploitability, or other characteristics.
-
CVE Modified by [email protected]
May. 14, 2024
Action Type Old Value New Value -
CVE Modified by [email protected]
Oct. 19, 2018
Action Type Old Value New Value Removed Reference http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/489175/100/0/threaded [No Types Assigned] Removed Reference http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/489330/100/0/threaded [No Types Assigned] Removed Reference http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/489212/100/0/threaded [No Types Assigned] Removed Reference http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/489335/100/0/threaded [No Types Assigned] Removed Reference http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/489296/100/0/threaded [No Types Assigned] Removed Reference http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/489257/100/0/threaded [No Types Assigned] Removed Reference http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/489322/100/0/threaded [No Types Assigned] Removed Reference http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/489163/100/0/threaded [No Types Assigned] Removed Reference http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/489189/100/0/threaded [No Types Assigned] Removed Reference http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/489295/100/0/threaded [No Types Assigned] Removed Reference http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/489269/100/0/threaded [No Types Assigned] Removed Reference http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/489342/100/0/threaded [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/489342/100/0/threaded [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/489335/100/0/threaded [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/489330/100/0/threaded [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/489322/100/0/threaded [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/489296/100/0/threaded [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/489295/100/0/threaded [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/489269/100/0/threaded [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/489257/100/0/threaded [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/489212/100/0/threaded [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/489189/100/0/threaded [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/489175/100/0/threaded [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/489163/100/0/threaded [No Types Assigned] -
CVE Modified by [email protected]
Jul. 11, 2017
Action Type Old Value New Value Removed Reference http://xforce.iss.net/xforce/xfdb/18041 [No Types Assigned] Added Reference https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/18041 [No Types Assigned] -
CVE Modified by [email protected]
Oct. 18, 2016
Action Type Old Value New Value Removed Reference http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bugtraq&m=109881362530790&w=2 Added Reference http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=109881362530790&w=2 -
Initial Analysis by [email protected]
Jan. 01, 2004
Action Type Old Value New Value
CWE - Common Weakness Enumeration
While CVE identifies
specific instances of vulnerabilities, CWE categorizes the common flaws or
weaknesses that can lead to vulnerabilities. CVE-2004-1038 is
associated with the following CWEs:
Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)
Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification
(CAPEC)
stores attack patterns, which are descriptions of the common attributes and
approaches employed by adversaries to exploit the CVE-2004-1038
weaknesses.
Exploit Prediction
EPSS is a daily estimate of the probability of exploitation activity being observed over the next 30 days.
0.18 }} -0.05%
score
0.54515
percentile