CVE-2004-1094
IBM Lotus Notes Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
Description
Buffer overflow in InnerMedia DynaZip DUNZIP32.dll file version 5.00.03 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a ZIP file containing a file with a long filename, as demonstrated using (1) a .rjs (skin) file in RealPlayer 10 through RealPlayer 10.5 (6.0.12.1053), RealOne Player 1 and 2, (2) the Restore Backup function in CheckMark Software Payroll 2004/2005 3.9.6 and earlier, (3) CheckMark MultiLedger before 7.0.2, (4) dtSearch 6.x and 7.x, (5) mcupdmgr.exe and mghtml.exe in McAfee VirusScan 10 Build 10.0.21 and earlier, (6) IBM Lotus Notes before 6.5.5, and other products. NOTE: it is unclear whether this is the same vulnerability as CVE-2004-0575, although the data manipulations are the same.
INFO
Published Date :
Jan. 10, 2005, 5 a.m.
Last Modified :
Nov. 20, 2024, 11:50 p.m.
Source :
[email protected]
Remotely Exploitable :
Yes !
Impact Score :
10.0
Exploitability Score :
10.0
Affected Products
The following products are affected by CVE-2004-1094
vulnerability.
Even if cvefeed.io
is aware of the exact versions of the
products
that
are
affected, the information is not represented in the table below.
References to Advisories, Solutions, and Tools
Here, you will find a curated list of external links that provide in-depth
information, practical solutions, and valuable tools related to
CVE-2004-1094
.
We scan GitHub repositories to detect new proof-of-concept exploits. Following list is a collection of public exploits and proof-of-concepts, which have been published on GitHub (sorted by the most recently updated).
Results are limited to the first 15 repositories due to potential performance issues.
The following list is the news that have been mention
CVE-2004-1094
vulnerability anywhere in the article.
The following table lists the changes that have been made to the
CVE-2004-1094
vulnerability over time.
Vulnerability history details can be useful for understanding the evolution of a vulnerability, and for identifying the most recent changes that may impact the vulnerability's severity, exploitability, or other characteristics.
-
CVE Modified by af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Nov. 20, 2024
Action Type Old Value New Value Added Reference http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2004-10/1044.html Added Reference http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=109894226007607&w=2 Added Reference http://secunia.com/advisories/17096 Added Reference http://secunia.com/advisories/17394 Added Reference http://secunia.com/advisories/18194 Added Reference http://secunia.com/advisories/19451 Added Reference http://securityreason.com/securityalert/296 Added Reference http://securityreason.com/securityalert/653 Added Reference http://securitytracker.com/id?1011944 Added Reference http://securitytracker.com/id?1012297 Added Reference http://securitytracker.com/id?1016817 Added Reference http://service.real.com/help/faq/security/041026_player/EN/ Added Reference http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/582498 Added Reference http://www.networksecurity.fi/advisories/dtsearch.html Added Reference http://www.networksecurity.fi/advisories/lotus-notes.html Added Reference http://www.networksecurity.fi/advisories/mcafee-virusscan.html Added Reference http://www.networksecurity.fi/advisories/multiledger.html Added Reference http://www.networksecurity.fi/advisories/payroll.html Added Reference http://www.osvdb.org/19906 Added Reference http://www.securiteam.com/windowsntfocus/6Z00W00EAM.html Added Reference http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/420274/100/0/threaded Added Reference http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/429361/100/0/threaded Added Reference http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/445369/100/0/threaded Added Reference http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/11555 Added Reference http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2005/2057 Added Reference http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1176 Added Reference https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/17879 Added Reference https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/22737 -
CVE Modified by [email protected]
May. 14, 2024
Action Type Old Value New Value -
CVE Modified by [email protected]
Oct. 19, 2018
Action Type Old Value New Value Removed Reference http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/445369/100/0/threaded [No Types Assigned] Removed Reference http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/420274/100/0/threaded [No Types Assigned] Removed Reference http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/429361/100/0/threaded [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/445369/100/0/threaded [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/429361/100/0/threaded [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/420274/100/0/threaded [No Types Assigned] -
CVE Modified by [email protected]
Jul. 11, 2017
Action Type Old Value New Value Removed Reference http://xforce.iss.net/xforce/xfdb/22737 [No Types Assigned] Removed Reference http://xforce.iss.net/xforce/xfdb/17879 [Vendor Advisory] Added Reference https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/22737 [No Types Assigned] Added Reference https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/17879 [No Types Assigned] -
CVE Modified by [email protected]
Oct. 18, 2016
Action Type Old Value New Value Removed Reference http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bugtraq&m=109894226007607&w=2 Added Reference http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=109894226007607&w=2 -
Initial Analysis by [email protected]
Jan. 01, 2004
Action Type Old Value New Value
CWE - Common Weakness Enumeration
While CVE identifies
specific instances of vulnerabilities, CWE categorizes the common flaws or
weaknesses that can lead to vulnerabilities. CVE-2004-1094
is
associated with the following CWEs:
Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)
Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification
(CAPEC)
stores attack patterns, which are descriptions of the common attributes and
approaches employed by adversaries to exploit the CVE-2004-1094
weaknesses.
Exploit Prediction
EPSS is a daily estimate of the probability of exploitation activity being observed over the next 30 days.
88.79 }} 12.61%
score
0.98963
percentile