CVE-2010-0295
Lighttpd Remote Memory Consumption DoS
Description
lighttpd before 1.4.26, and 1.5.x, allocates a buffer for each read operation that occurs for a request, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) by breaking a request into small pieces that are sent at a slow rate.
INFO
Published Date :
Feb. 3, 2010, 7:30 p.m.
Last Modified :
Nov. 21, 2024, 1:11 a.m.
Source :
[email protected]
Remotely Exploitable :
Yes !
Impact Score :
2.9
Exploitability Score :
10.0
References to Advisories, Solutions, and Tools
Here, you will find a curated list of external links that provide in-depth
information, practical solutions, and valuable tools related to
CVE-2010-0295.
We scan GitHub repositories to detect new proof-of-concept exploits. Following list is a collection of public exploits and proof-of-concepts, which have been published on GitHub (sorted by the most recently updated).
Results are limited to the first 15 repositories due to potential performance issues.
The following list is the news that have been mention
CVE-2010-0295 vulnerability anywhere in the article.
The following table lists the changes that have been made to the
CVE-2010-0295 vulnerability over time.
Vulnerability history details can be useful for understanding the evolution of a vulnerability, and for identifying the most recent changes that may impact the vulnerability's severity, exploitability, or other characteristics.
-
CVE Modified by af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Nov. 21, 2024
Action Type Old Value New Value Added Reference http://blogs.sun.com/security/entry/cve_2010_0295_vulnerability_in Added Reference http://download.lighttpd.net/lighttpd/security/lighttpd_sa_2010_01.txt Added Reference http://download.lighttpd.net/lighttpd/security/lighttpd-1.4.x_fix_slow_request_dos.patch Added Reference http://download.lighttpd.net/lighttpd/security/lighttpd-1.5_fix_slow_request_dos.patch Added Reference http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-May/041264.html Added Reference http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-May/041296.html Added Reference http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-May/041307.html Added Reference http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-02/msg00003.html Added Reference http://redmine.lighttpd.net/issues/2147 Added Reference http://redmine.lighttpd.net/projects/lighttpd/repository/revisions/2710 Added Reference http://redmine.lighttpd.net/projects/lighttpd/repository/revisions/2711 Added Reference http://secunia.com/advisories/38403 Added Reference http://secunia.com/advisories/39765 Added Reference http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201006-17.xml Added Reference http://www.debian.org/security/2010/dsa-1987 Added Reference http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/02/01/8 Added Reference http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/38036 Added Reference http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0172 Added Reference https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/56038 -
CVE Modified by [email protected]
May. 14, 2024
Action Type Old Value New Value -
CVE Modified by [email protected]
Aug. 17, 2017
Action Type Old Value New Value Removed Reference http://xforce.iss.net/xforce/xfdb/56038 [No Types Assigned] Added Reference https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/56038 [No Types Assigned] -
Initial Analysis by [email protected]
Feb. 04, 2010
Action Type Old Value New Value
CWE - Common Weakness Enumeration
While CVE identifies
specific instances of vulnerabilities, CWE categorizes the common flaws or
weaknesses that can lead to vulnerabilities. CVE-2010-0295 is
associated with the following CWEs:
Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)
Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification
(CAPEC)
stores attack patterns, which are descriptions of the common attributes and
approaches employed by adversaries to exploit the CVE-2010-0295
weaknesses.
Exploit Prediction
EPSS is a daily estimate of the probability of exploitation activity being observed over the next 30 days.
9.13 }} 1.70%
score
0.94643
percentile