CVE-2014-3505
OpenSSL DTLS Double Free Denial of Service
Description
Double free vulnerability in d1_both.c in the DTLS implementation in OpenSSL 0.9.8 before 0.9.8zb, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0n, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1i allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via crafted DTLS packets that trigger an error condition.
INFO
Published Date :
Aug. 13, 2014, 11:55 p.m.
Last Modified :
Nov. 7, 2023, 2:20 a.m.
Source :
[email protected]
Remotely Exploitable :
Yes !
Impact Score :
2.9
Exploitability Score :
10.0
Public PoC/Exploit Available at Github
CVE-2014-3505 has a 5 public PoC/Exploit available at Github.
Go to the Public Exploits tab to see the list.
References to Advisories, Solutions, and Tools
Here, you will find a curated list of external links that provide in-depth
information, practical solutions, and valuable tools related to
CVE-2014-3505.
We scan GitHub repositories to detect new proof-of-concept exploits. Following list is a collection of public exploits and proof-of-concepts, which have been published on GitHub (sorted by the most recently updated).
None
None
Fast IP Lookups for Open Ports and Vulnerabilities
r rstats shodan shodan-api
R
Scripts and resources to help build secure docker images
Shell
hardened ssh jump host and dev docker container
Ruby Shell
Results are limited to the first 15 repositories due to potential performance issues.
The following list is the news that have been mention
CVE-2014-3505 vulnerability anywhere in the article.
The following table lists the changes that have been made to the
CVE-2014-3505 vulnerability over time.
Vulnerability history details can be useful for understanding the evolution of a vulnerability, and for identifying the most recent changes that may impact the vulnerability's severity, exploitability, or other characteristics.
-
CVE Modified by [email protected]
May. 14, 2024
Action Type Old Value New Value -
CVE Modified by [email protected]
Nov. 07, 2023
Action Type Old Value New Value Added Reference Red Hat, Inc. https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=bff1ce4e6a1c57c3d0a5f9e4f85ba6385fccfe8b [No types assigned] Removed Reference Red Hat, Inc. https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commit;h=bff1ce4e6a1c57c3d0a5f9e4f85ba6385fccfe8b -
CVE Modified by [email protected]
Jan. 07, 2017
Action Type Old Value New Value Added Reference https://lists.balabit.hu/pipermail/syslog-ng-announce/2014-September/000196.html [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21683389 [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=nas8N1020240 [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1030693 [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/69081 [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2014:158 [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://support.f5.com/kb/en-us/solutions/public/15000/500/sol15573.html [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://secunia.com/advisories/61250 [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://secunia.com/advisories/61184 [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://secunia.com/advisories/61100 [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://secunia.com/advisories/61040 [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://secunia.com/advisories/60803 [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://secunia.com/advisories/60778 [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://secunia.com/advisories/60684 [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://secunia.com/advisories/60493 [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://secunia.com/advisories/60221 [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://secunia.com/advisories/60022 [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://secunia.com/advisories/59743 [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://secunia.com/advisories/59710 [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://secunia.com/advisories/59700 [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://secunia.com/advisories/58962 [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-August/136473.html [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-August/136470.html [No Types Assigned] Added Reference http://linux.oracle.com/errata/ELSA-2014-1052.html [No Types Assigned] -
CVE Modified by [email protected]
Dec. 03, 2016
Action Type Old Value New Value Added Reference http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00011.html [No Types Assigned] -
CVE Modified by [email protected]
Mar. 24, 2015
Action Type Old Value New Value Added Reference http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=142660345230545&w=2 -
CVE Modified by [email protected]
Feb. 21, 2015
Action Type Old Value New Value Added Reference http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201412-39.xml -
CVE Modified by [email protected]
Nov. 19, 2014
Action Type Old Value New Value Added Reference http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21682293 Added Reference http://secunia.com/advisories/59756 -
CVE Modified by [email protected]
Nov. 14, 2014
Action Type Old Value New Value Added Reference http://www.huawei.com/en/security/psirt/security-bulletins/security-advisories/hw-372998.htm Added Reference http://secunia.com/advisories/61775 Added Reference http://secunia.com/advisories/61959 Added Reference http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21686997 -
Initial Analysis by [email protected]
Aug. 14, 2014
Action Type Old Value New Value
CWE - Common Weakness Enumeration
While CVE identifies
specific instances of vulnerabilities, CWE categorizes the common flaws or
weaknesses that can lead to vulnerabilities. CVE-2014-3505 is
associated with the following CWEs:
Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)
Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification
(CAPEC)
stores attack patterns, which are descriptions of the common attributes and
approaches employed by adversaries to exploit the CVE-2014-3505
weaknesses.
Exploit Prediction
EPSS is a daily estimate of the probability of exploitation activity being observed over the next 30 days.
86.51 }} -2.37%
score
0.98641
percentile