8.3
HIGH
CVE-2021-42694
Apache Unicode Homoglyph Identifier Injection Vulnerability
Description

An issue was discovered in the character definitions of the Unicode Specification through 14.0. The specification allows an adversary to produce source code identifiers such as function names using homoglyphs that render visually identical to a target identifier. Adversaries can leverage this to inject code via adversarial identifier definitions in upstream software dependencies invoked deceptively in downstream software. NOTE: the Unicode Consortium offers the following alternative approach to presenting this concern. An issue is noted in the nature of international text that can affect applications that implement support for The Unicode Standard (all versions). Unless mitigated, an adversary could produce source code identifiers using homoglyph characters that render visually identical to but are distinct from a target identifier. In this way, an adversary could inject adversarial identifier definitions in upstream software that are not detected by human reviewers and are invoked deceptively in downstream software. The Unicode Consortium has documented this class of security vulnerability in its document, Unicode Technical Report #36, Unicode Security Considerations. The Unicode Consortium also provides guidance on mitigations for this class of issues in Unicode Technical Standard #39, Unicode Security Mechanisms.

INFO

Published Date :

Nov. 1, 2021, 4:15 a.m.

Last Modified :

Nov. 21, 2024, 6:27 a.m.

Remotely Exploitable :

Yes !

Impact Score :

6.0

Exploitability Score :

1.6
Public PoC/Exploit Available at Github

CVE-2021-42694 has a 7 public PoC/Exploit available at Github. Go to the Public Exploits tab to see the list.

Affected Products

The following products are affected by CVE-2021-42694 vulnerability. Even if cvefeed.io is aware of the exact versions of the products that are affected, the information is not represented in the table below.

ID Vendor Product Action
1 Unicode unicode
References to Advisories, Solutions, and Tools

Here, you will find a curated list of external links that provide in-depth information, practical solutions, and valuable tools related to CVE-2021-42694.

URL Resource
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/11/01/1 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/11/01/6 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode14.0.0/ Release Notes Vendor Advisory
https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1007.html Third Party Advisory
https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-09 Third Party Advisory
https://trojansource.codes Third Party Advisory
https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/999008 Third Party Advisory US Government Resource
https://www.scyon.nl/post/trojans-in-your-source-code Exploit Third Party Advisory
https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr36/ Technical Description Vendor Advisory
https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr39/ Technical Description Vendor Advisory
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/11/01/1 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/11/01/6 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode14.0.0/ Release Notes Vendor Advisory
https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1007.html Third Party Advisory
https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-09 Third Party Advisory
https://trojansource.codes Third Party Advisory
https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/999008 Third Party Advisory US Government Resource
https://www.scyon.nl/post/trojans-in-your-source-code Exploit Third Party Advisory
https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr36/ Technical Description Vendor Advisory
https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr39/ Technical Description Vendor Advisory

We scan GitHub repositories to detect new proof-of-concept exploits. Following list is a collection of public exploits and proof-of-concepts, which have been published on GitHub (sorted by the most recently updated).

Map Vulnerabilities into Different Layers of the Container Image

Python

Updated: 1 year, 11 months ago
1 stars 0 fork 0 watcher
Born at : Oct. 5, 2022, 12:07 p.m. This repo has been linked 1276 different CVEs too.

None

Updated: 5 months, 3 weeks ago
8 stars 1 fork 1 watcher
Born at : June 21, 2022, 7:45 a.m. This repo has been linked 943 different CVEs too.

A GitHub Action to find Unicode control characters using the Red Hat diagnostic tool https://access.redhat.com/security/vulnerabilities/RHSB-2021-007 to detect RHSB-2021-007 Trojan source attacks (CVE-2021-42574,CVE-2021-42694)

Dockerfile Shell Python

Updated: 3 years ago
0 stars 2 fork 2 watcher
Born at : Nov. 25, 2021, 8:02 a.m. This repo has been linked 2 different CVEs too.

Generate malicious files using recently published homoglyphic-attack (CVE-2021-42694)

Python

Updated: 4 months, 1 week ago
17 stars 8 fork 8 watcher
Born at : Nov. 2, 2021, 8:39 p.m. This repo has been linked 1 different CVEs too.

None

Updated: 1 year, 4 months ago
1 stars 0 fork 0 watcher
Born at : Nov. 1, 2021, 5:13 p.m. This repo has been linked 2 different CVEs too.

Docker image for MarkLogic Server

database docker marklogic

Makefile Shell RobotFramework XQuery

Updated: 1 month, 2 weeks ago
8 stars 12 fork 12 watcher
Born at : Aug. 16, 2021, 9:29 p.m. This repo has been linked 26 different CVEs too.

Ansible Everyday Utilities

ansible ansible-playbooks security security-tools automation linux bsd redhat-enterprise-linux debian ubuntu centos fedora hardening

Shell Perl Python

Updated: 1 month, 1 week ago
13 stars 4 fork 4 watcher
Born at : Jan. 14, 2017, 6:57 a.m. This repo has been linked 40 different CVEs too.

Results are limited to the first 15 repositories due to potential performance issues.

The following list is the news that have been mention CVE-2021-42694 vulnerability anywhere in the article.

The following table lists the changes that have been made to the CVE-2021-42694 vulnerability over time.

Vulnerability history details can be useful for understanding the evolution of a vulnerability, and for identifying the most recent changes that may impact the vulnerability's severity, exploitability, or other characteristics.

  • CVE Modified by af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108

    Nov. 21, 2024

    Action Type Old Value New Value
    Added Reference http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/11/01/1
    Added Reference http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/11/01/6
    Added Reference http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode14.0.0/
    Added Reference https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1007.html
    Added Reference https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-09
    Added Reference https://trojansource.codes
    Added Reference https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/999008
    Added Reference https://www.scyon.nl/post/trojans-in-your-source-code
    Added Reference https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr36/
    Added Reference https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr39/
  • CVE Modified by 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0

    Oct. 29, 2024

    Action Type Old Value New Value
    Added CWE CISA-ADP CWE-94
    Removed CWE CISA-ADP CWE-1007
  • CVE Modified by [email protected]

    Aug. 04, 2024

    Action Type Old Value New Value
  • CVE Modified by 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0

    Aug. 01, 2024

    Action Type Old Value New Value
    Added CWE CISA-ADP CWE-1007
    Added CVSS V3.1 CISA-ADP AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
  • CVE Modified by [email protected]

    Jul. 18, 2024

    Action Type Old Value New Value
  • CVE Modified by [email protected]

    May. 17, 2024

    Action Type Old Value New Value
  • CVE Modified by [email protected]

    May. 14, 2024

    Action Type Old Value New Value
  • CVE Modified by [email protected]

    Apr. 11, 2024

    Action Type Old Value New Value
  • CVE Modified by [email protected]

    Mar. 21, 2024

    Action Type Old Value New Value
    Added Tag MITRE disputed
  • CVE Modified by [email protected]

    Nov. 07, 2023

    Action Type Old Value New Value
    Changed Description ** DISPUTED ** An issue was discovered in the character definitions of the Unicode Specification through 14.0. The specification allows an adversary to produce source code identifiers such as function names using homoglyphs that render visually identical to a target identifier. Adversaries can leverage this to inject code via adversarial identifier definitions in upstream software dependencies invoked deceptively in downstream software. NOTE: the Unicode Consortium offers the following alternative approach to presenting this concern. An issue is noted in the nature of international text that can affect applications that implement support for The Unicode Standard (all versions). Unless mitigated, an adversary could produce source code identifiers using homoglyph characters that render visually identical to but are distinct from a target identifier. In this way, an adversary could inject adversarial identifier definitions in upstream software that are not detected by human reviewers and are invoked deceptively in downstream software. The Unicode Consortium has documented this class of security vulnerability in its document, Unicode Technical Report #36, Unicode Security Considerations. The Unicode Consortium also provides guidance on mitigations for this class of issues in Unicode Technical Standard #39, Unicode Security Mechanisms. An issue was discovered in the character definitions of the Unicode Specification through 14.0. The specification allows an adversary to produce source code identifiers such as function names using homoglyphs that render visually identical to a target identifier. Adversaries can leverage this to inject code via adversarial identifier definitions in upstream software dependencies invoked deceptively in downstream software. NOTE: the Unicode Consortium offers the following alternative approach to presenting this concern. An issue is noted in the nature of international text that can affect applications that implement support for The Unicode Standard (all versions). Unless mitigated, an adversary could produce source code identifiers using homoglyph characters that render visually identical to but are distinct from a target identifier. In this way, an adversary could inject adversarial identifier definitions in upstream software that are not detected by human reviewers and are invoked deceptively in downstream software. The Unicode Consortium has documented this class of security vulnerability in its document, Unicode Technical Report #36, Unicode Security Considerations. The Unicode Consortium also provides guidance on mitigations for this class of issues in Unicode Technical Standard #39, Unicode Security Mechanisms.
  • Modified Analysis by [email protected]

    Dec. 06, 2022

    Action Type Old Value New Value
    Changed Reference Type https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-09 No Types Assigned https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-09 Third Party Advisory
  • CVE Modified by [email protected]

    Oct. 16, 2022

    Action Type Old Value New Value
    Added Reference https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-09 [No Types Assigned]
  • Modified Analysis by [email protected]

    Sep. 03, 2022

    Action Type Old Value New Value
    Changed Reference Type https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1007.html No Types Assigned https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1007.html Third Party Advisory
    Changed Reference Type https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr36/ No Types Assigned https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr36/ Technical Description, Vendor Advisory
    Changed Reference Type https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr39/ No Types Assigned https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr39/ Technical Description, Vendor Advisory
  • CVE Modified by [email protected]

    May. 12, 2022

    Action Type Old Value New Value
    Changed Description An issue was discovered in the character definitions of the Unicode Specification through 14.0. The specification allows an adversary to produce source code identifiers such as function names using homoglyphs that render visually identical to a target identifier. Adversaries can leverage this to inject code via adversarial identifier definitions in upstream software dependencies invoked deceptively in downstream software. ** DISPUTED ** An issue was discovered in the character definitions of the Unicode Specification through 14.0. The specification allows an adversary to produce source code identifiers such as function names using homoglyphs that render visually identical to a target identifier. Adversaries can leverage this to inject code via adversarial identifier definitions in upstream software dependencies invoked deceptively in downstream software. NOTE: the Unicode Consortium offers the following alternative approach to presenting this concern. An issue is noted in the nature of international text that can affect applications that implement support for The Unicode Standard (all versions). Unless mitigated, an adversary could produce source code identifiers using homoglyph characters that render visually identical to but are distinct from a target identifier. In this way, an adversary could inject adversarial identifier definitions in upstream software that are not detected by human reviewers and are invoked deceptively in downstream software. The Unicode Consortium has documented this class of security vulnerability in its document, Unicode Technical Report #36, Unicode Security Considerations. The Unicode Consortium also provides guidance on mitigations for this class of issues in Unicode Technical Standard #39, Unicode Security Mechanisms.
    Added Reference https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr36/ [No Types Assigned]
    Added Reference https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1007.html [No Types Assigned]
    Added Reference https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr39/ [No Types Assigned]
  • CWE Remap by [email protected]

    May. 03, 2022

    Action Type Old Value New Value
    Changed CWE CWE-94 NVD-CWE-OTHER
  • Modified Analysis by [email protected]

    Nov. 29, 2021

    Action Type Old Value New Value
    Changed Reference Type https://www.scyon.nl/post/trojans-in-your-source-code No Types Assigned https://www.scyon.nl/post/trojans-in-your-source-code Exploit, Third Party Advisory
  • CVE Modified by [email protected]

    Nov. 26, 2021

    Action Type Old Value New Value
    Added Reference https://www.scyon.nl/post/trojans-in-your-source-code [No Types Assigned]
  • Modified Analysis by [email protected]

    Nov. 16, 2021

    Action Type Old Value New Value
    Added CVSS V2 Metadata Victim must voluntarily interact with attack mechanism
    Removed CVSS V2 NIST (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P)
    Added CVSS V2 NIST (AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P)
    Removed CVSS V3.1 NIST AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
    Added CVSS V3.1 NIST AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
    Changed Reference Type https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/999008 No Types Assigned https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/999008 Third Party Advisory, US Government Resource
  • CVE Modified by [email protected]

    Nov. 09, 2021

    Action Type Old Value New Value
    Added Reference https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/999008 [No Types Assigned]
  • Initial Analysis by [email protected]

    Nov. 02, 2021

    Action Type Old Value New Value
    Added CVSS V2 NIST (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P)
    Added CVSS V3.1 NIST AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
    Changed Reference Type http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/11/01/1 No Types Assigned http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/11/01/1 Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
    Changed Reference Type http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/11/01/6 No Types Assigned http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/11/01/6 Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
    Changed Reference Type http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode14.0.0/ No Types Assigned http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode14.0.0/ Release Notes, Vendor Advisory
    Changed Reference Type https://trojansource.codes No Types Assigned https://trojansource.codes Third Party Advisory
    Added CWE NIST CWE-94
    Added CPE Configuration OR *cpe:2.3:a:unicode:unicode:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions up to (excluding) 14.0.0
  • CVE Modified by [email protected]

    Nov. 01, 2021

    Action Type Old Value New Value
    Added Reference http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/11/01/6 [No Types Assigned]
  • CVE Modified by [email protected]

    Nov. 01, 2021

    Action Type Old Value New Value
    Added Reference http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/11/01/1 [No Types Assigned]
EPSS is a daily estimate of the probability of exploitation activity being observed over the next 30 days. Following chart shows the EPSS score history of the vulnerability.
CWE - Common Weakness Enumeration

While CVE identifies specific instances of vulnerabilities, CWE categorizes the common flaws or weaknesses that can lead to vulnerabilities. CVE-2021-42694 is associated with the following CWEs:

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC) stores attack patterns, which are descriptions of the common attributes and approaches employed by adversaries to exploit the CVE-2021-42694 weaknesses.

Exploit Prediction

EPSS is a daily estimate of the probability of exploitation activity being observed over the next 30 days.

0.91 }} 0.37%

score

0.82604

percentile

CVSS31 - Vulnerability Scoring System
Attack Vector
Attack Complexity
Privileges Required
User Interaction
Scope
Confidentiality
Integrity
Availability