5.3
MEDIUM
CVE-2024-4603
OpenSSL DSA Key Checking Slowdown Vulnerability
Description

Issue summary: Checking excessively long DSA keys or parameters may be very slow. Impact summary: Applications that use the functions EVP_PKEY_param_check() or EVP_PKEY_public_check() to check a DSA public key or DSA parameters may experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service. The functions EVP_PKEY_param_check() or EVP_PKEY_public_check() perform various checks on DSA parameters. Some of those computations take a long time if the modulus (`p` parameter) is too large. Trying to use a very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not allow using public keys with a modulus which is over 10,000 bits in length for signature verification. However the key and parameter check functions do not limit the modulus size when performing the checks. An application that calls EVP_PKEY_param_check() or EVP_PKEY_public_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack. These functions are not called by OpenSSL itself on untrusted DSA keys so only applications that directly call these functions may be vulnerable. Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL pkey and pkeyparam command line applications when using the `-check` option. The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are affected by this issue.

INFO

Published Date :

May 16, 2024, 4:15 p.m.

Last Modified :

Oct. 14, 2024, 3:15 p.m.

Remotely Exploitable :

Yes !

Impact Score :

1.4

Exploitability Score :

3.9
Public PoC/Exploit Available at Github

CVE-2024-4603 has a 4 public PoC/Exploit available at Github. Go to the Public Exploits tab to see the list.

Affected Products

The following products are affected by CVE-2024-4603 vulnerability. Even if cvefeed.io is aware of the exact versions of the products that are affected, the information is not represented in the table below.

ID Vendor Product Action
1 Openssl openssl

We scan GitHub repositories to detect new proof-of-concept exploits. Following list is a collection of public exploits and proof-of-concepts, which have been published on GitHub (sorted by the most recently updated).

Fluentbit container image built as small as possible with security in mind

docker-image dockerfile fluent-bit

Dockerfile

Updated: 4 weeks, 2 days ago
0 stars 0 fork 0 watcher
Born at : Oct. 22, 2024, 8:40 a.m. This repo has been linked 41 different CVEs too.

Container Vulnerability Analysis tooling

Dockerfile Shell

Updated: 5 months, 1 week ago
0 stars 0 fork 0 watcher
Born at : June 10, 2024, 3:01 p.m. This repo has been linked 6 different CVEs too.

None

Updated: 2 months, 2 weeks ago
5 stars 0 fork 0 watcher
Born at : Feb. 23, 2023, 5:42 a.m. This repo has been linked 455 different CVEs too.

CDDS webMethods Retirement Project

webmethods-retirement ag pssg java springboot

Java Dockerfile

Updated: 3 months, 3 weeks ago
1 stars 5 fork 5 watcher
Born at : Oct. 20, 2021, 8:39 p.m. This repo has been linked 4 different CVEs too.

Results are limited to the first 15 repositories due to potential performance issues.

The following list is the news that have been mention CVE-2024-4603 vulnerability anywhere in the article.

The following table lists the changes that have been made to the CVE-2024-4603 vulnerability over time.

Vulnerability history details can be useful for understanding the evolution of a vulnerability, and for identifying the most recent changes that may impact the vulnerability's severity, exploitability, or other characteristics.

  • CVE Modified by [email protected]

    Oct. 14, 2024

    Action Type Old Value New Value
    Removed Reference OpenSSL Software Foundation http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/05/16/2
    Removed Reference OpenSSL Software Foundation https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0001/
    Added CWE OpenSSL Software Foundation CWE-606
  • CVE Modified by 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0

    Aug. 13, 2024

    Action Type Old Value New Value
    Added CWE CISA-ADP CWE-834
    Added CVSS V3.1 CISA-ADP AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
  • CVE Modified by [email protected]

    Jun. 21, 2024

    Action Type Old Value New Value
    Added Reference OpenSSL Software Foundation https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0001/ [No types assigned]
  • CVE Modified by [email protected]

    Jun. 10, 2024

    Action Type Old Value New Value
    Added Reference OpenSSL Software Foundation http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/05/16/2 [No types assigned]
  • CVE Received by [email protected]

    May. 16, 2024

    Action Type Old Value New Value
    Added Description Issue summary: Checking excessively long DSA keys or parameters may be very slow. Impact summary: Applications that use the functions EVP_PKEY_param_check() or EVP_PKEY_public_check() to check a DSA public key or DSA parameters may experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service. The functions EVP_PKEY_param_check() or EVP_PKEY_public_check() perform various checks on DSA parameters. Some of those computations take a long time if the modulus (`p` parameter) is too large. Trying to use a very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not allow using public keys with a modulus which is over 10,000 bits in length for signature verification. However the key and parameter check functions do not limit the modulus size when performing the checks. An application that calls EVP_PKEY_param_check() or EVP_PKEY_public_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack. These functions are not called by OpenSSL itself on untrusted DSA keys so only applications that directly call these functions may be vulnerable. Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL pkey and pkeyparam command line applications when using the `-check` option. The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are affected by this issue.
    Added Reference OpenSSL Software Foundation https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20240516.txt [No types assigned]
    Added Reference OpenSSL Software Foundation https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/3559e868e58005d15c6013a0c1fd832e51c73397 [No types assigned]
    Added Reference OpenSSL Software Foundation https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/9c39b3858091c152f52513c066ff2c5a47969f0d [No types assigned]
    Added Reference OpenSSL Software Foundation https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/da343d0605c826ef197aceedc67e8e04f065f740 [No types assigned]
    Added Reference OpenSSL Software Foundation https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/53ea06486d296b890d565fb971b2764fcd826e7e [No types assigned]
EPSS is a daily estimate of the probability of exploitation activity being observed over the next 30 days. Following chart shows the EPSS score history of the vulnerability.
CWE - Common Weakness Enumeration

While CVE identifies specific instances of vulnerabilities, CWE categorizes the common flaws or weaknesses that can lead to vulnerabilities. CVE-2024-4603 is associated with the following CWEs:

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC) stores attack patterns, which are descriptions of the common attributes and approaches employed by adversaries to exploit the CVE-2024-4603 weaknesses.

CVSS31 - Vulnerability Scoring System
Attack Vector
Attack Complexity
Privileges Required
User Interaction
Scope
Confidentiality
Integrity
Availability