0.0
NA
CVE-2026-118389
Gitea RubyGems compact index injection through package metadata
Description

The RubyGems package registry accepted gems whose platform, dependency names or dependency version requirements contain newline characters. Because the compact index served to clients is line-based, a user who can publish a gem to an owner's registry could forge index entries, such as packages that do not exist or additional versions of an existing gem with dependencies of their choice. Clients that resolve gems from that registry could then be led to install attacker-chosen dependencies. Gems with such metadata are now rejected.

INFO

Published Date :

Nov. 15, 2026, 10:17 p.m.

Last Modified :

Nov. 15, 2026, 10:17 p.m.

Remotely Exploit :

No

Source :

88ee5874-cf24-4952-aea0-31affedb7ff2
Affected Products

The following products are affected by CVE-2026-118389 vulnerability. Even if cvefeed.io is aware of the exact versions of the products that are affected, the information is not represented in the table below.

ID Vendor Product Action
1 Gitea gitea
Solution
Gems with newline characters in platform or dependency metadata are now rejected.
  • Ensure dependency metadata does not contain newline characters.
  • Validate all gem metadata before publishing.
  • Update RubyGems to the latest version.
References to Advisories, Solutions, and Tools
CWE - Common Weakness Enumeration

While CVE identifies specific instances of vulnerabilities, CWE categorizes the common flaws or weaknesses that can lead to vulnerabilities. CVE-2026-118389 is associated with the following CWEs:

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC) stores attack patterns, which are descriptions of the common attributes and approaches employed by adversaries to exploit the CVE-2026-118389 weaknesses.

CAPEC-3: Using Leading 'Ghost' Character Sequences to Bypass Input Filters Using Leading 'Ghost' Character Sequences to Bypass Input Filters CAPEC-6: Argument Injection Argument Injection CAPEC-7: Blind SQL Injection Blind SQL Injection CAPEC-8: Buffer Overflow in an API Call Buffer Overflow in an API Call CAPEC-9: Buffer Overflow in Local Command-Line Utilities Buffer Overflow in Local Command-Line Utilities CAPEC-10: Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables CAPEC-13: Subverting Environment Variable Values Subverting Environment Variable Values CAPEC-14: Client-side Injection-induced Buffer Overflow Client-side Injection-induced Buffer Overflow CAPEC-24: Filter Failure through Buffer Overflow Filter Failure through Buffer Overflow CAPEC-28: Fuzzing Fuzzing CAPEC-34: HTTP Response Splitting HTTP Response Splitting CAPEC-42: MIME Conversion MIME Conversion CAPEC-43: Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers CAPEC-45: Buffer Overflow via Symbolic Links Buffer Overflow via Symbolic Links CAPEC-46: Overflow Variables and Tags Overflow Variables and Tags CAPEC-47: Buffer Overflow via Parameter Expansion Buffer Overflow via Parameter Expansion CAPEC-51: Poison Web Service Registry Poison Web Service Registry CAPEC-52: Embedding NULL Bytes Embedding NULL Bytes CAPEC-53: Postfix, Null Terminate, and Backslash Postfix, Null Terminate, and Backslash CAPEC-64: Using Slashes and URL Encoding Combined to Bypass Validation Logic Using Slashes and URL Encoding Combined to Bypass Validation Logic CAPEC-67: String Format Overflow in syslog() String Format Overflow in syslog() CAPEC-71: Using Unicode Encoding to Bypass Validation Logic Using Unicode Encoding to Bypass Validation Logic CAPEC-72: URL Encoding URL Encoding CAPEC-76: Manipulating Web Input to File System Calls Manipulating Web Input to File System Calls CAPEC-78: Using Escaped Slashes in Alternate Encoding Using Escaped Slashes in Alternate Encoding CAPEC-79: Using Slashes in Alternate Encoding Using Slashes in Alternate Encoding CAPEC-80: Using UTF-8 Encoding to Bypass Validation Logic Using UTF-8 Encoding to Bypass Validation Logic CAPEC-83: XPath Injection XPath Injection CAPEC-84: XQuery Injection XQuery Injection CAPEC-101: Server Side Include (SSI) Injection Server Side Include (SSI) Injection CAPEC-105: HTTP Request Splitting HTTP Request Splitting CAPEC-108: Command Line Execution through SQL Injection Command Line Execution through SQL Injection CAPEC-120: Double Encoding Double Encoding CAPEC-135: Format String Injection Format String Injection CAPEC-250: XML Injection XML Injection CAPEC-267: Leverage Alternate Encoding Leverage Alternate Encoding CAPEC-273: HTTP Response Smuggling HTTP Response Smuggling

We scan GitHub repositories to detect new proof-of-concept exploits. Following list is a collection of public exploits and proof-of-concepts, which have been published on GitHub (sorted by the most recently updated).

Results are limited to the first 15 repositories due to potential performance issues.

The following list is the news that have been mention CVE-2026-118389 vulnerability anywhere in the article.

The following table lists the changes that have been made to the CVE-2026-118389 vulnerability over time.

Vulnerability history details can be useful for understanding the evolution of a vulnerability, and for identifying the most recent changes that may impact the vulnerability's severity, exploitability, or other characteristics.

  • New CVE Received by 88ee5874-cf24-4952-aea0-31affedb7ff2

    Nov. 15, 2026

    Action Type Old Value New Value
    Added Description The RubyGems package registry accepted gems whose platform, dependency names or dependency version requirements contain newline characters. Because the compact index served to clients is line-based, a user who can publish a gem to an owner's registry could forge index entries, such as packages that do not exist or additional versions of an existing gem with dependencies of their choice. Clients that resolve gems from that registry could then be led to install attacker-chosen dependencies. Gems with such metadata are now rejected.
    Added CWE CWE-74
    Added Affected New affected value received. <a href="https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main/cves/2026/118xxx/CVE-2026-118389.json">CVE-2026-118389</a>
    Added Reference https://blog.gitea.com/release-of-28.4.0/
    Added Reference https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/39782
    Added Reference https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/39900
    Added Reference https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/releases/tag/v28.3.0
    Added Reference https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/security/advisories/GHSA-49c9-hm8q-6rvq
EPSS is a daily estimate of the probability of exploitation activity being observed over the next 30 days. Following chart shows the EPSS score history of the vulnerability.