6.5
MEDIUM CVSS 3.1
CVE-2026-48075
OpenReception's unauthenticated add-to-tunnel endpoint accepts arbitrary appointment injections
Description

OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.0.5, the `add-to-tunnel` endpoint creates a new appointment row in any client tunnel without any caller authentication. A request that supplies any valid `tunnelId` and any valid `emailHash` (the two need not belong to the same tunnel) results in an inserted appointment with `status = "CONFIRMED"`, attacker-controlled ciphertext fields, attacker-controlled date and duration, and an attacker-chosen agent. The endpoint validates only that some tunnel exists with the given `emailHash`, then writes the appointment using the attacker-supplied `tunnelId` directly. The `emailHash` lookup is effectively an existence check on the tenant; it does not authenticate the caller as the owner of the supplied `tunnelId`. Combined with the absence of any session, Authorization header, booking access token, or PoW, this makes the endpoint accept arbitrary appointment writes into arbitrary tunnels. By contrast, the sibling endpoint `create-new-client` (used to bootstrap a brand-new client tunnel) requires a Bearer bootstrap booking access token issued by the bootstrap-challenge / bootstrap-verify flow. The `add-to-tunnel` endpoint, intended for return-clients booking additional appointments, has no equivalent gate. The application's own middleware confirms this is intentional: `add-to-tunnel` is explicitly listed in the apiAuthHandle public-route allowlist alongside the bootstrap and challenge endpoints (which legitimately have no session). Version 1.0.5 fixes the issue.

INFO

Published Date :

Aug. 6, 2026, 10:17 p.m.

Last Modified :

Oct. 23, 2026, 9:10 p.m.

Remotely Exploit :

Yes !
Affected Products

The following products are affected by CVE-2026-48075 vulnerability. Even if cvefeed.io is aware of the exact versions of the products that are affected, the information is not represented in the table below.

ID Vendor Product Action
1 Open-reception appointment-booking-software
CVSS Scores
The Common Vulnerability Scoring System is a standardized framework for assessing the severity of vulnerabilities in software and systems. We collect and displays CVSS scores from various sources for each CVE.
Score Version Severity Vector Exploitability Score Impact Score Source
CVSS 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
CVSS 3.1 MEDIUM [email protected]
CVSS 3.1 MEDIUM MITRE-CVE
Solution
Update OpenReception software to version 1.0.5 or later to fix authorization flaws.
  • Update OpenReception software to version 1.0.5.
  • Verify appointment writes require proper authentication.
  • Review API endpoint access controls.
References to Advisories, Solutions, and Tools
CWE - Common Weakness Enumeration

While CVE identifies specific instances of vulnerabilities, CWE categorizes the common flaws or weaknesses that can lead to vulnerabilities. CVE-2026-48075 is associated with the following CWEs:

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC) stores attack patterns, which are descriptions of the common attributes and approaches employed by adversaries to exploit the CVE-2026-48075 weaknesses.

We scan GitHub repositories to detect new proof-of-concept exploits. Following list is a collection of public exploits and proof-of-concepts, which have been published on GitHub (sorted by the most recently updated).

Results are limited to the first 15 repositories due to potential performance issues.

The following list is the news that have been mention CVE-2026-48075 vulnerability anywhere in the article.

The following table lists the changes that have been made to the CVE-2026-48075 vulnerability over time.

Vulnerability history details can be useful for understanding the evolution of a vulnerability, and for identifying the most recent changes that may impact the vulnerability's severity, exploitability, or other characteristics.

  • CVE Translated by [email protected]

    Oct. 23, 2026

    Action Type Old Value New Value
    Added Translation Title: appointment-booking-software de open-reception, Description: El software de reserva de citas de OpenReception proporciona una plataforma de reserva de citas cifrada de extremo a extremo. Antes de la versión 1.0.5, el endpoint “add-to-tunnel” crea una nueva fila de cita en cualquier túnel de cliente sin ninguna autenticación del llamante. Una solicitud que proporciona cualquier “tunnelId” válido y cualquier “emailHash” válido (los dos no necesitan pertenecer al mismo túnel) resulta en una cita insertada con “status = “CONFIRMED””, campos de texto cifrado controlados por el atacante, fecha y duración controladas por el atacante, y un agente elegido por el atacante. El endpoint valida solo que existe algún túnel con el “emailHash” dado, luego escribe la cita usando directamente el “tunnelId” proporcionado por el atacante. La búsqueda de “emailHash” es efectivamente una verificación de existencia en el inquilino; no autentica al llamante como el propietario del “tunnelId” proporcionado. Combinado con la ausencia de cualquier sesión, encabezado de autorización, token de acceso de reserva o PoW, esto hace que el endpoint acepte escrituras de citas arbitrarias en túneles arbitrarios. Por el contrario, el endpoint hermano “create-new-client” (utilizado para arrancar un túnel de cliente completamente nuevo) requiere un token de acceso de reserva de arranque Bearer emitido por el flujo bootstrap-challenge / bootstrap-verify. El endpoint “add-to-tunnel”, destinado a clientes recurrentes que reservan citas adicionales, no tiene una puerta equivalente. El propio middleware de la aplicación confirma que esto es intencional: “add-to-tunnel” está explícitamente listado en la lista de permitidos de rutas públicas de apiAuthHandle junto con los endpoints de arranque y desafío (los cuales legítimamente no tienen sesión). La versión 1.0.5 corrige el problema.
  • CVE Modified by 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0

    Aug. 07, 2026

    Action Type Old Value New Value
    Added Reference https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/security/advisories/GHSA-rhp5-vmcx-4qm8
    Added SSVC {'id': 'CVE-2026-48075', 'role': 'CISA Coordinator', 'options': [{'exploitation': 'poc'}, {'automatable': 'no'}, {'technicalImpact': 'partial'}], 'version': '2.0.3', 'timestamp': '2026-08-07T17:14:46.685036Z'}
  • New CVE Received by [email protected]

    Aug. 06, 2026

    Action Type Old Value New Value
    Added Affected [{'vendor': 'open-reception', 'product': 'appointment-booking-software', 'versions': [{'status': 'affected', 'version': '< 1.0.5'}]}]
    Added Description OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.0.5, the `add-to-tunnel` endpoint creates a new appointment row in any client tunnel without any caller authentication. A request that supplies any valid `tunnelId` and any valid `emailHash` (the two need not belong to the same tunnel) results in an inserted appointment with `status = "CONFIRMED"`, attacker-controlled ciphertext fields, attacker-controlled date and duration, and an attacker-chosen agent. The endpoint validates only that some tunnel exists with the given `emailHash`, then writes the appointment using the attacker-supplied `tunnelId` directly. The `emailHash` lookup is effectively an existence check on the tenant; it does not authenticate the caller as the owner of the supplied `tunnelId`. Combined with the absence of any session, Authorization header, booking access token, or PoW, this makes the endpoint accept arbitrary appointment writes into arbitrary tunnels. By contrast, the sibling endpoint `create-new-client` (used to bootstrap a brand-new client tunnel) requires a Bearer bootstrap booking access token issued by the bootstrap-challenge / bootstrap-verify flow. The `add-to-tunnel` endpoint, intended for return-clients booking additional appointments, has no equivalent gate. The application's own middleware confirms this is intentional: `add-to-tunnel` is explicitly listed in the apiAuthHandle public-route allowlist alongside the bootstrap and challenge endpoints (which legitimately have no session). Version 1.0.5 fixes the issue.
    Added CVSS V3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
    Added CWE CWE-862
    Added Reference https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/commit/4522a44c001782848faff5529d7c1e2be7ac9ef5
    Added Reference https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/security/advisories/GHSA-rhp5-vmcx-4qm8
EPSS is a daily estimate of the probability of exploitation activity being observed over the next 30 days. Following chart shows the EPSS score history of the vulnerability.