8.7
HIGH CVSS 3.1
CVE-2026-49259
NukeViet CMS Stored Cross-Site Scripting
Description

## Summary A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in NukeViet CMS versions 4.x through 4.5.08. A low-privileged authenticated user can store a JavaScript payload in their profile's display name fields. The payload executes in the browser of any visitor — including administrators — who clicks the **Reply** ("Answer") link on a comment posted by that user. ## Affected Component The `{COMMENT.post_name}` template variable is interpolated without JavaScript-context escaping into an inline `onclick` handler in both comment block positions: - `themes/default/modules/comment/comment.tpl` line 27 (top-level comments) - `themes/default/modules/comment/comment.tpl` line 64 (nested/reply comments) ```html onclick="nv_commment_feedback(event, {COMMENT.cid}, '{COMMENT.post_name}')" ``` ## Root Cause The `first_name` and `last_name` profile fields are sanitized with HTML numeric character references (`'` → `&#039;`, `(` → `&#40;`, `)` → `&#41;`, `/` → `&#x002F;`) via `Request::_get_title()` with `$specialchars = true`. This encoding is correct for plain HTML attribute and element contexts, but **insufficient for a JavaScript string literal embedded inside an HTML attribute**. Browsers decode HTML entities in attribute values **before** the JavaScript engine parses the string. As a result, `&#039;` is decoded back to `'`, which terminates the JS string early and allows the remainder of the value to be executed as JavaScript. The combined display name (`nv_show_name_user(first_name, last_name)`) is what reaches the template, giving an attacker up to ~200 encoded characters across both fields — sufficient for any practical payload. ## Proof of Concept Set `first_name` to the following value in profile settings (`/index.php?nv=users&op=editinfo`), then post any comment: ```text a');alert(document.domain);// ``` The value is stored as `a&#039;&#41;;alert&#40;document.domain&#41;;&#x002F;&#x002F;`. When a visitor clicks the Reply link on the comment, the browser renders: ```js nv_commment_feedback(event, 1, 'a');alert(document.domain);// Tester') ``` causing `alert(document.domain)` to execute in the visitor's browser context. A data-exfiltration variant (split across both name fields) navigates the victim's browser to an attacker-controlled URL carrying `document.cookie` as a query parameter. End-to-end verification was performed using a local listener. ## Exploitation Conditions (default configuration) | Condition | Default value | Effect | |---|---|---| | `captcha_area_comm` | `1` | No CAPTCHA for logged-in users — payload delivery requires no CAPTCHA solve | | `auto_postcomm` | enabled | Comments are published immediately without moderation | | `active_editinfo_censor` | `0` | Profile edits take effect immediately without admin review | | CSP `script-src` | `'unsafe-inline'` | Inline `onclick` handlers execute normally | Any registered member can set the payload and post a comment with no additional steps. If `captcha_area_comm` is set to `0`, the `name` field of anonymous comments (`modules/comment/funcs/post.php`) is processed by the same `get_title(..., 1)` call, making exploitation possible without authentication. ## Impact An attacker with a regular user account can execute arbitrary JavaScript in the browser of any visitor who interacts with the Reply button on their comment, including site administrators. Practical consequences include: - **Privilege escalation via admin session hijacking** — forging administrative actions (content modification, account manipulation) in the context of an authenticated admin. - **Credential phishing** — injecting a fake login form into the page. - **Data exfiltration** — reading page content and non-`HttpOnly` cookies. > Note: NukeViet session cookies carry the `HttpOnly` flag, so they are not directly readable via `document.cookie`; however, the above attack vectors remain fully viable. ## Remediation **Preferred fix:** Remove `post_name` from the inline handler entirely. Pass only `cid` to `nv_commment_feedback` and have the function retrieve the display name from the already-rendered DOM (e.g., the adjacent `<strong class="cm_item">` element). **Alternative fix:** If the value must be passed inline, encode it with `json_encode($post_name)` (PHP) so that the output is a properly escaped JavaScript string literal, not an HTML-entity-encoded one. HTML numeric character references must not be relied upon for JavaScript string escaping. As a general note, the result of `get_title(..., $specialchars=true)` is safe for HTML element content and quoted HTML attribute values, but **unsafe when placed inside a JavaScript string literal within an attribute**. Other locations in the codebase using the same pattern should be audited. ## Resources - OWASP: Cross Site Scripting Prevention — Rule 2: Attribute Encoding is Not Sufficient for JS Contexts - CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation - CWE-116: Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output

INFO

Published Date :

July 13, 2026, 5:22 p.m.

Last Modified :

July 13, 2026, 5:22 p.m.

Remotely Exploit :

Yes !

Source :

github-security-advisories
Affected Products

The following products are affected by CVE-2026-49259 vulnerability. Even if cvefeed.io is aware of the exact versions of the products that are affected, the information is not represented in the table below.

ID Vendor Product Action
1 Nukeviet nukeviet
CVSS Scores
The Common Vulnerability Scoring System is a standardized framework for assessing the severity of vulnerabilities in software and systems. We collect and displays CVSS scores from various sources for each CVE.
Score Version Severity Vector Exploitability Score Impact Score Source
CVSS 3.1 HIGH github
Solution
Update NukeViet CMS to escape JavaScript strings properly or remove user input from handlers.
  • Encode user input using json_encode for JavaScript string literals.
  • Alternatively, remove user input from inline JavaScript handlers.
  • Audit other code for similar input handling patterns.
References to Advisories, Solutions, and Tools

Here, you will find a curated list of external links that provide in-depth information, practical solutions, and valuable tools related to CVE-2026-49259.

URL Resource
https://github.com/nukeviet/nukeviet/security/advisories/GHSA-w2w5-w2pw-r929
https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-w2w5-w2pw-r929
CWE - Common Weakness Enumeration

While CVE identifies specific instances of vulnerabilities, CWE categorizes the common flaws or weaknesses that can lead to vulnerabilities. CVE-2026-49259 is associated with the following CWEs:

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC) stores attack patterns, which are descriptions of the common attributes and approaches employed by adversaries to exploit the CVE-2026-49259 weaknesses.

We scan GitHub repositories to detect new proof-of-concept exploits. Following list is a collection of public exploits and proof-of-concepts, which have been published on GitHub (sorted by the most recently updated).

Results are limited to the first 15 repositories due to potential performance issues.

The following list is the news that have been mention CVE-2026-49259 vulnerability anywhere in the article.

EPSS is a daily estimate of the probability of exploitation activity being observed over the next 30 days. Following chart shows the EPSS score history of the vulnerability.