6.5
MEDIUM CVSS 3.1
CVE-2026-59230
Apache Camel: Camel-Mail: the MimeMultipart data format copied MIME headers onto the Camel message without a header filter strategy when unmarshalling with headersInline enabled
Description

Improper input validation vulnerability in Apache Camel. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 2.17.0 before 4.14.9, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.4, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.0. The camel-mail component ships a MimeMultipart data format that can unmarshal a MIME multipart message. When it is configured with headersInline set to true, the unmarshal path copies the MIME headers of the incoming message onto the Camel message: it enumerates every header that is not one of the three standard ones it generates itself - Message-ID, MIME-Version and Content-Type - and calls setHeader for each, applying no HeaderFilterStrategy. The names of those MIME headers come from the message being unmarshalled, so a sender able to influence the message could place a header whose name falls in the Camel-internal namespace and have it set on the Exchange. Camel components read control headers from that namespace to override their configured behaviour - the camel-sql producer, for instance, takes the statement to execute from a Camel header when one is present - so an injected header could redirect what a downstream step in the route does with data the route author never intended it to take from the message. Which sinks are reachable, and what the consequences are, depends entirely on what the route does after the unmarshal step. The camel-mail consumer already applied a header filter strategy on its own inbound path, so this was the parallel inbound path into the same component that the earlier hardening did not cover. The affected copy is reached only when headersInline is enabled, which is not the default: with the default setting the MIME headers are surfaced as attachments rather than as message headers, and are not affected. The behaviour dates back to the introduction of the data format in 2.17.0 and was present on every release line until this fix. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.22.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.9. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.4. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, leave headersInline at its default of false where the inline headers are not needed, since the copy is only reached when it is enabled. Where it must stay enabled, strip Camel-internal headers immediately after the unmarshal step, for example with removeHeaders(“Camel*”) placed before any processor or producer that reads control headers, and do not unmarshal MIME content from an untrusted sender into a route that dispatches on header values. As defence in depth, treat the header names of any MIME message arriving from outside the trust boundary as untrusted input.

INFO

Published Date :

Aug. 24, 2026, 5:17 p.m.

Last Modified :

Oct. 12, 2026, 3:10 p.m.

Remotely Exploit :

Yes !
Affected Products

The following products are affected by CVE-2026-59230 vulnerability. Even if cvefeed.io is aware of the exact versions of the products that are affected, the information is not represented in the table below.

ID Vendor Product Action
1 Apache camel
CVSS Scores
The Common Vulnerability Scoring System is a standardized framework for assessing the severity of vulnerabilities in software and systems. We collect and displays CVSS scores from various sources for each CVE.
Score Version Severity Vector Exploitability Score Impact Score Source
CVSS 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
CVSS 3.1 MEDIUM 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
Solution
Upgrade Apache Camel to a patched version or disable inline headers if not needed.
  • Upgrade Apache Camel to version 4.22.0 or later.
  • Upgrade to 4.14.9 for the 4.14.x LTS stream.
  • Upgrade to 4.18.4 for the 4.18.x stream.
  • Disable inline headers if not required and headersInline is false.
References to Advisories, Solutions, and Tools

Here, you will find a curated list of external links that provide in-depth information, practical solutions, and valuable tools related to CVE-2026-59230.

URL Resource
https://camel.apache.org/security/CVE-2026-59230.html Mailing List Vendor Advisory
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/08/24/7 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
CWE - Common Weakness Enumeration

While CVE identifies specific instances of vulnerabilities, CWE categorizes the common flaws or weaknesses that can lead to vulnerabilities. CVE-2026-59230 is associated with the following CWEs:

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC) stores attack patterns, which are descriptions of the common attributes and approaches employed by adversaries to exploit the CVE-2026-59230 weaknesses.

CAPEC-3: Using Leading 'Ghost' Character Sequences to Bypass Input Filters Using Leading 'Ghost' Character Sequences to Bypass Input Filters CAPEC-7: Blind SQL Injection Blind SQL Injection CAPEC-8: Buffer Overflow in an API Call Buffer Overflow in an API Call CAPEC-9: Buffer Overflow in Local Command-Line Utilities Buffer Overflow in Local Command-Line Utilities CAPEC-10: Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables CAPEC-13: Subverting Environment Variable Values Subverting Environment Variable Values CAPEC-14: Client-side Injection-induced Buffer Overflow Client-side Injection-induced Buffer Overflow CAPEC-22: Exploiting Trust in Client Exploiting Trust in Client CAPEC-23: File Content Injection File Content Injection CAPEC-24: Filter Failure through Buffer Overflow Filter Failure through Buffer Overflow CAPEC-28: Fuzzing Fuzzing CAPEC-31: Accessing/Intercepting/Modifying HTTP Cookies Accessing/Intercepting/Modifying HTTP Cookies CAPEC-42: MIME Conversion MIME Conversion CAPEC-43: Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers CAPEC-45: Buffer Overflow via Symbolic Links Buffer Overflow via Symbolic Links CAPEC-46: Overflow Variables and Tags Overflow Variables and Tags CAPEC-47: Buffer Overflow via Parameter Expansion Buffer Overflow via Parameter Expansion CAPEC-52: Embedding NULL Bytes Embedding NULL Bytes CAPEC-53: Postfix, Null Terminate, and Backslash Postfix, Null Terminate, and Backslash CAPEC-63: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) CAPEC-64: Using Slashes and URL Encoding Combined to Bypass Validation Logic Using Slashes and URL Encoding Combined to Bypass Validation Logic CAPEC-67: String Format Overflow in syslog() String Format Overflow in syslog() CAPEC-71: Using Unicode Encoding to Bypass Validation Logic Using Unicode Encoding to Bypass Validation Logic CAPEC-72: URL Encoding URL Encoding CAPEC-73: User-Controlled Filename User-Controlled Filename CAPEC-78: Using Escaped Slashes in Alternate Encoding Using Escaped Slashes in Alternate Encoding CAPEC-79: Using Slashes in Alternate Encoding Using Slashes in Alternate Encoding CAPEC-80: Using UTF-8 Encoding to Bypass Validation Logic Using UTF-8 Encoding to Bypass Validation Logic CAPEC-81: Web Server Logs Tampering Web Server Logs Tampering CAPEC-83: XPath Injection XPath Injection CAPEC-85: AJAX Footprinting AJAX Footprinting CAPEC-88: OS Command Injection OS Command Injection CAPEC-101: Server Side Include (SSI) Injection Server Side Include (SSI) Injection CAPEC-104: Cross Zone Scripting Cross Zone Scripting CAPEC-108: Command Line Execution through SQL Injection Command Line Execution through SQL Injection CAPEC-109: Object Relational Mapping Injection Object Relational Mapping Injection CAPEC-110: SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter Tampering SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter Tampering CAPEC-120: Double Encoding Double Encoding CAPEC-135: Format String Injection Format String Injection CAPEC-136: LDAP Injection LDAP Injection CAPEC-153: Input Data Manipulation Input Data Manipulation CAPEC-182: Flash Injection Flash Injection CAPEC-209: XSS Using MIME Type Mismatch XSS Using MIME Type Mismatch CAPEC-230: Serialized Data with Nested Payloads Serialized Data with Nested Payloads CAPEC-231: Oversized Serialized Data Payloads Oversized Serialized Data Payloads CAPEC-250: XML Injection XML Injection CAPEC-261: Fuzzing for garnering other adjacent user/sensitive data Fuzzing for garnering other adjacent user/sensitive data CAPEC-267: Leverage Alternate Encoding Leverage Alternate Encoding CAPEC-473: Signature Spoof Signature Spoof CAPEC-588: DOM-Based XSS DOM-Based XSS CAPEC-664: Server Side Request Forgery Server Side Request Forgery

We scan GitHub repositories to detect new proof-of-concept exploits. Following list is a collection of public exploits and proof-of-concepts, which have been published on GitHub (sorted by the most recently updated).

Results are limited to the first 15 repositories due to potential performance issues.

The following list is the news that have been mention CVE-2026-59230 vulnerability anywhere in the article.

The following table lists the changes that have been made to the CVE-2026-59230 vulnerability over time.

Vulnerability history details can be useful for understanding the evolution of a vulnerability, and for identifying the most recent changes that may impact the vulnerability's severity, exploitability, or other characteristics.

  • CVE Translated by [email protected]

    Oct. 12, 2026

    Action Type Old Value New Value
    Added Translation Title: Apache Camel de Apache Software Foundation, Description: Vulnerabilidad de validación de entrada incorrecta en Apache Camel. Este problema afecta a Apache Camel: desde 2.17.0 antes de 4.14.9, desde 4.15.0 antes de 4.18.4, desde 4.19.0 antes de 4.22.0. El componente camel-mail incluye un formato de datos MimeMultipart que puede deserializar un mensaje MIME multipart. Cuando se configura con headersInline establecido en true, la ruta de deserialización copia los encabezados MIME del mensaje entrante al mensaje Camel: enumera cada encabezado que no es uno de los tres estándar que genera por sí mismo - Message-ID, MIME-Version y Content-Type - y llama a setHeader para cada uno, sin aplicar ninguna HeaderFilterStrategy. Los nombres de esos encabezados MIME provienen del mensaje que se está deserializando, por lo que un remitente capaz de influir en el mensaje podría colocar un encabezado cuando nombre caiga en el espacio de nombres interno de Camel y hacer que se establezca en el Exchange. Los componentes Camel leen encabezados de control de ese espacio de nombres para anular su comportamiento configurado - el productor camel-sql, por ejemplo, toma la declaración a ejecutar de un encabezado Camel cuando está presente - por lo que un encabezado inyectado podría redirigir lo que hace un paso posterior en la ruta con datos que el autor de la ruta nunca tuvo la intención de que tomara del mensaje. Qué sumideros son alcanzables, y cuáles son las consecuencias, depende enteramente de lo que haga la ruta después del paso de deserialización. El consumidor camel-mail ya aplicaba una estrategia de filtro de encabezados en su propia ruta de entrada, por lo que esta era la ruta de entrada paralela al mismo componente que el endurecimiento anterior no cubrió. La copia afectada solo se alcanza cuando headersInline está habilitado, lo cual no es el valor predeterminado: con la configuración predeterminada, los encabezados MIME se muestran como adjuntos en lugar de como encabezados de mensaje, y no se ven afectados. El comportamiento se remonta a la introducción del formato de datos en 2.17.0 y estuvo presente en cada línea de lanzamiento hasta esta corrección. Se recomienda a los usuarios actualizar a la versión 4.22.0, que corrige el problema. Si los usuarios están en la rama de lanzamientos LTS 4.14.x, se sugiere que actualicen a 4.14.9. Si los usuarios están en la rama de lanzamientos 4.18.x, se sugiere que actualicen a 4.18.4. Para implementaciones que no pueden actualizar inmediatamente, deje headersInline en su valor predeterminado de false donde los encabezados en línea no son necesarios, ya que la copia solo se alcanza cuando está habilitado. Donde deba permanecer habilitado, elimine los encabezados internos de Camel inmediatamente después del paso de deserialización, por ejemplo, con removeHeaders('Camel') colocado antes de cualquier procesador o productor que lea encabezados de control, y no deserialice contenido MIME de un remitente no confiable en una ruta que despache según los valores de los encabezados. Como defensa en profundidad, trate los nombres de los encabezados de cualquier mensaje MIME que llegue desde fuera del límite de confianza como entrada no confiable.
  • Initial Analysis by [email protected]

    Aug. 27, 2026

    Action Type Old Value New Value
    Added CPE Configuration OR *cpe:2.3:a:apache:camel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 2.17.0 up to (excluding) 4.14.9 *cpe:2.3:a:apache:camel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 4.15.0 up to (excluding) 4.18.4 *cpe:2.3:a:apache:camel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 4.19.0 up to (excluding) 4.22.0
    Added Reference Type Apache Software Foundation: https://camel.apache.org/security/CVE-2026-59230.html Types: Mailing List, Vendor Advisory
    Added Reference Type CVE: http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/08/24/7 Types: Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
  • CVE Modified by 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0

    Aug. 25, 2026

    Action Type Old Value New Value
    Added CVSS V3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
    Added SSVC {'id': 'CVE-2026-59230', 'role': 'CISA Coordinator', 'options': [{'exploitation': 'none'}, {'automatable': 'yes'}, {'technicalImpact': 'partial'}], 'version': '2.0.3', 'timestamp': '2026-08-25T19:34:45.895471Z'}
  • CVE Modified by af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108

    Aug. 24, 2026

    Action Type Old Value New Value
    Added Reference http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/08/24/7
  • New CVE Received by [email protected]

    Aug. 24, 2026

    Action Type Old Value New Value
    Added Affected [{'vendor': 'Apache Software Foundation', 'product': 'Apache Camel', 'versions': [{'status': 'affected', 'version': '2.17.0', 'lessThan': '4.14.9', 'versionType': 'semver'}, {'status': 'affected', 'version': '4.15.0', 'lessThan': '4.18.4', 'versionType': 'semver'}, {'status': 'affected', 'version': '4.19.0', 'lessThan': '4.22.0', 'versionType': 'semver'}], 'packageURL': 'pkg:maven/org.apache.camel/camel-mail', 'packageName': 'org.apache.camel:camel-mail', 'collectionURL': 'https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2', 'defaultStatus': 'unaffected'}]
    Added Description Improper input validation vulnerability in Apache Camel. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 2.17.0 before 4.14.9, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.4, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.0. The camel-mail component ships a MimeMultipart data format that can unmarshal a MIME multipart message. When it is configured with headersInline set to true, the unmarshal path copies the MIME headers of the incoming message onto the Camel message: it enumerates every header that is not one of the three standard ones it generates itself - Message-ID, MIME-Version and Content-Type - and calls setHeader for each, applying no HeaderFilterStrategy. The names of those MIME headers come from the message being unmarshalled, so a sender able to influence the message could place a header whose name falls in the Camel-internal namespace and have it set on the Exchange. Camel components read control headers from that namespace to override their configured behaviour - the camel-sql producer, for instance, takes the statement to execute from a Camel header when one is present - so an injected header could redirect what a downstream step in the route does with data the route author never intended it to take from the message. Which sinks are reachable, and what the consequences are, depends entirely on what the route does after the unmarshal step. The camel-mail consumer already applied a header filter strategy on its own inbound path, so this was the parallel inbound path into the same component that the earlier hardening did not cover. The affected copy is reached only when headersInline is enabled, which is not the default: with the default setting the MIME headers are surfaced as attachments rather than as message headers, and are not affected. The behaviour dates back to the introduction of the data format in 2.17.0 and was present on every release line until this fix. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.22.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.9. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.4. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, leave headersInline at its default of false where the inline headers are not needed, since the copy is only reached when it is enabled. Where it must stay enabled, strip Camel-internal headers immediately after the unmarshal step, for example with removeHeaders(“Camel*”) placed before any processor or producer that reads control headers, and do not unmarshal MIME content from an untrusted sender into a route that dispatches on header values. As defence in depth, treat the header names of any MIME message arriving from outside the trust boundary as untrusted input.
    Added CWE CWE-20
    Added Reference https://camel.apache.org/security/CVE-2026-59230.html
EPSS is a daily estimate of the probability of exploitation activity being observed over the next 30 days. Following chart shows the EPSS score history of the vulnerability.