CWE-1023: Incomplete Comparison with Missing Factors
Description
The product performs a comparison between entities that must consider multiple factors or characteristics of each entity, but the comparison does not include one or more of these factors.
Submission Date :
Jan. 4, 2018, midnight
Modification Date :
2023-10-26 00:00:00+00:00
Organization :
MITRE
Extended Description
An incomplete comparison can lead to resultant weaknesses, e.g., by operating on the wrong object or making a security decision without considering a required factor.
Example - 1
Consider an application in which Truck objects are defined to be the same if they have the same make, the same model, and were manufactured in the same year. Here, the equals() method only checks the make and model of the Truck objects, but the year of manufacture is not included.
if (o == null) return false;if (o == this) return true;if (!(o instanceof Truck)) return false;Truck t = (Truck) o;return (this.make.equals(t.getMake()) && this.model.equals(t.getModel()));private String make;private String model;private int year;public boolean equals(Object o) {}public class Truck {}
Example - 2
This example defines a fixed username and password. The AuthenticateUser() function is intended to accept a username and a password from an untrusted user, and check to ensure that it matches the username and password. If the username and password match, AuthenticateUser() is intended to indicate that authentication succeeded. In AuthenticateUser(), the strncmp() call uses the string length of an attacker-provided inPass parameter in order to determine how many characters to check in the password. So, if the attacker only provides a password of length 1, the check will only examine the first byte of the application's password before determining success. As a result, this partial comparison leads to improper authentication (CWE-287). Any of these passwords would still cause authentication to succeed for the "admin" user: This significantly reduces the search space for an attacker, making brute force attacks more feasible. The same problem also applies to the username, so values such as "a" and "adm" will succeed for the username. While this demonstrative example may not seem realistic, see the Observed Examples for CVE entries that effectively reflect this same weakness.// /* Ignore CWE-259 (hard-coded password) and CWE-309 (use of password system for authentication) for this example. *///
logEvent("Auth failure of username using strlen of inUser");return(AUTH_FAIL);
logEvent("Auth success of password using strlen of inUser");return(AUTH_SUCCESS);
logEvent("Auth fail of password using sizeof");return(AUTH_FAIL);if (strncmp(username, inUser, strlen(inUser))) {}if (! strncmp(pass, inPass, strlen(inPass))) {}else {}
ExitError("Usage: Provide a username and password");
DoAuthenticatedTask(argv[1]);
ExitError("Authentication failed");int authResult;if (argc < 3) {}authResult = AuthenticateUser(argv[1], argv[2]);if (authResult == AUTH_SUCCESS) {}else {}char *username = "admin";char *pass = "password";int AuthenticateUser(char *inUser, char *inPass) {}int main (int argc, char **argv) {}
ppapaspass
Related Weaknesses
This table shows the weaknesses and high level categories that are related to this weakness. These relationships are defined to give an overview of the different insight to similar items that may exist at higher and lower levels of abstraction.
Visit http://cwe.mitre.org/ for more details.