CVE-2006-2656
Libtiff TIFFsplit Stack Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
Description
Stack-based buffer overflow in the tiffsplit command in libtiff 3.8.2 and earlier might might allow attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long filename. NOTE: tiffsplit is not setuid. If there is not a common scenario under which tiffsplit is called with attacker-controlled command line arguments, then perhaps this issue should not be included in CVE.
INFO
Published Date :
May 30, 2006, 6:02 p.m.
Last Modified :
Nov. 21, 2024, 12:11 a.m.
Source :
[email protected]
Remotely Exploitable :
Yes !
Impact Score :
6.4
Exploitability Score :
10.0
Public PoC/Exploit Available at Github
CVE-2006-2656 has a 2 public PoC/Exploit available at Github.
Go to the Public Exploits tab to see the list.
References to Advisories, Solutions, and Tools
Here, you will find a curated list of external links that provide in-depth
information, practical solutions, and valuable tools related to
CVE-2006-2656.
We scan GitHub repositories to detect new proof-of-concept exploits. Following list is a collection of public exploits and proof-of-concepts, which have been published on GitHub (sorted by the most recently updated).
None
C Perl 6 Perl ASP HTML Rich Text Format Visual Basic TeX Assembly Shell
The vm images in this repo are lost, we recommend our new project: https://github.com/hust-open-atom-club/S2VulnHub
linux vulnerability reproduction cve edb
Shell C Perl PHP TeX Python Assembly Makefile HTML XSLT
Results are limited to the first 15 repositories due to potential performance issues.
The following list is the news that have been mention
CVE-2006-2656 vulnerability anywhere in the article.
The following table lists the changes that have been made to the
CVE-2006-2656 vulnerability over time.
Vulnerability history details can be useful for understanding the evolution of a vulnerability, and for identifying the most recent changes that may impact the vulnerability's severity, exploitability, or other characteristics.
-
CVE Modified by af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Nov. 21, 2024
Action Type Old Value New Value Added Reference http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-security-announce/2006-Jun/0008.html Added Reference http://marc.info/?l=vuln-dev&m=114857412916909&w=2 Added Reference http://secunia.com/advisories/20501 Added Reference http://secunia.com/advisories/20520 Added Reference http://secunia.com/advisories/20766 Added Reference http://secunia.com/advisories/21002 Added Reference http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200607-03.xml Added Reference http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1091 Added Reference http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2006:095 Added Reference https://usn.ubuntu.com/289-1/ Added Reference https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2006-May/msg00127.html -
CVE Modified by [email protected]
May. 14, 2024
Action Type Old Value New Value -
CVE Modified by [email protected]
Nov. 07, 2023
Action Type Old Value New Value Changed Description Stack-based buffer overflow in the tiffsplit command in libtiff 3.8.2 and earlier might might allow attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long filename. NOTE: tiffsplit is not setuid. If there is not a common scenario under which tiffsplit is called with attacker-controlled command line arguments, then perhaps this issue should not be included in CVE. Stack-based buffer overflow in the tiffsplit command in libtiff 3.8.2 and earlier might might allow attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long filename. NOTE: tiffsplit is not setuid. If there is not a common scenario under which tiffsplit is called with attacker-controlled command line arguments, then perhaps this issue should not be included in CVE. -
CVE Modified by [email protected]
Feb. 13, 2023
Action Type Old Value New Value Changed Description Stack-based buffer overflow in the tiffsplit command in libtiff 3.8.2 and earlier might might allow attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long filename. NOTE: tiffsplit is not setuid. If there is not a common scenario under which tiffsplit is called with attacker-controlled command line arguments, then perhaps this issue should not be included in CVE. Stack-based buffer overflow in the tiffsplit command in libtiff 3.8.2 and earlier might might allow attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long filename. NOTE: tiffsplit is not setuid. If there is not a common scenario under which tiffsplit is called with attacker-controlled command line arguments, then perhaps this issue should not be included in CVE. -
CVE Modified by [email protected]
Oct. 03, 2018
Action Type Old Value New Value Removed Reference http://www.ubuntulinux.org/support/documentation/usn/usn-289-1 [No Types Assigned] Added Reference https://usn.ubuntu.com/289-1/ [No Types Assigned] -
CVE Translated by [email protected]
Oct. 20, 2016
Action Type Old Value New Value -
CVE Modified by [email protected]
Oct. 18, 2016
Action Type Old Value New Value Removed Reference http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=vuln-dev&m=114857412916909&w=2 Added Reference http://marc.info/?l=vuln-dev&m=114857412916909&w=2 -
Initial Analysis by [email protected]
May. 30, 2006
Action Type Old Value New Value
CWE - Common Weakness Enumeration
While CVE identifies
specific instances of vulnerabilities, CWE categorizes the common flaws or
weaknesses that can lead to vulnerabilities. CVE-2006-2656 is
associated with the following CWEs:
Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)
Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification
(CAPEC)
stores attack patterns, which are descriptions of the common attributes and
approaches employed by adversaries to exploit the CVE-2006-2656
weaknesses.
Exploit Prediction
EPSS is a daily estimate of the probability of exploitation activity being observed over the next 30 days.
2.80 }} -0.12%
score
0.90360
percentile